Rise and Shine

(London, May 2011)



10:0: President Obama holds a bilateral meeting with Britain’s Prime Minister Cameron

11:15: The President and PM Cameron hold a joint press conference

White House live * C-Span

1:55: The President departs the White House

3:05: Arrives New York City

4:30: Delivers remarks at a DNC event (Private Residence)

6:05: Delivers remarks at a DNC event (Private Residence)

8:40: Delivers remarks at a DCCC/DSCC event (The Waldorf Astoria Hotel)

10:0: Departs New York City

11:05: Arrives the White House


Most ‘amusing’ headline of the morning ….. “may be asked” ….. may? He’ll be asked about nothing else – because, you know, nothing else matters 🙄


The week ahead:

Tuesday: The President attends meetings at the White House

Wednesday: Delivers remarks at the National Peace Officers Memorial Service, an annual ceremony honoring law enforcement who were killed in the line of duty in the previous year

Thursday: Welcomes Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey to the White House for meetings and a working dinner

Friday: Travels to Baltimore, Maryland in his second Middle Class Jobs and Opportunity Tour



ThinkProgress: Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, a Republican who was appointed to the position by George W. Bush, told CBS News on Saturday that he would have handled the situation in Benghazi the same way that the Obama administration did last September.

During an interview that aired on CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday morning, Gates defended the administration’s reaction to the attacks in Libya and dismissed many of the criticisms leveled by his fellow Republicans as “cartoonish”….

More here – and see Steve Benen too



Steve Benen: There were several oddities about the House Oversight Committee’s Benghazi hearing last week, but one of the unanswered questions related to Chairman Darrell Issa’s (R-Calif.) choice of witnesses. Yesterday, on “Meet the Press,” this grew even more problematic.

The hearing was supposed to be about the committee getting more answers about the attack, but Issa chose not to invite former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, a veteran diplomat from the Reagan and Bush administrations, who helped oversee the independent investigation into the events in Benghazi. If the goal was to get more information, why not ask Pickering to appear?

More here



Addicting Info: 10 Examples Of Why The Republican ‘Benghazi’ Talking Point Is Hypocritical

At this point it’s well-established there was no wrongdoing by President Barack Obama or former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when it came to the response to the terror strike in Benghazi that Fox News and conservatives around the nation have been trying to use to score political points against the high-profile Democratic leaders.

Unfortunately for Republicans, the fact that they have pushed so hard when there was no “scandal” shows that they were only out to use Benghazi for the political ammunition. Here’s even more proof, with 10 examples of other things that Republicans didn’t seem nearly so upset about or interested in investigating….

More here



In case you missed it: ‘Republicans raising money off Benghazi effort’ (Washington Post)


Michael Cohen in The Guardian



Ezra Klein: The good reasons for the IRS’s dumb mistake ….. The IRS does need some kind of test that helps them weed out political organizations attempting to register as tax-exempt 501(c)4 social welfare groups. But that test has to be studiously, unquestionably neutral.

….. The context for all this is that after Citizens United and some related decisions, the number of groups registering as 501(c)4s doubled. Because the timing of that doubling coincided with a rise in political activism on the right rather than the left, a lot of the politicized groups attempting to register as 501(c)4s were describing their purpose in tea party terms. A popular conceit, for instance, was that they existed to educate on the Constitution – even if the particular pedagogical method meant participating in Republican Party primaries and pressuring incumbent politicians.

…. It is worth remembering an important fact here: The IRS is supposed to reject groups that are primarily political from registering as 501(c)4s. If they’re going to do that, then they need some kind of test that helps them flag problematic applicants…

More here






E.J. Dionne: …. Public officials are very selective about when violence and death matter.

Politicians who tout themselves as advocates of law and order don’t want to be unmasked as caring even more about their ratings from gun lobbyists. And opponents of the most moderate gun reforms engage in a shameless game of bait-and-switch. Because measures such as background checks would not stop every murder, they’re declared useless even though they’d still save lives. Then the gun lobby turns around and opposes other measures, such as a ban on high-capacity magazines, which could prevent some of the killings that background checks might not.

The lack of coherence doesn’t bother those who are willing to tolerate all manner of violence to keep the gun business free of inconvenient restraints. Their goal is to exhaust supporters of sane gun laws and get them to give up until the next big tragedy strikes.

Mayor Tom Barrett of Milwaukee has never given up and never given in. One of the earliest members of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the group spearheaded by New York’s Michael Bloomberg and Boston’s Tom Menino, he has made curbing urban bloodshed a personal cause….

More here



ThinkProgress: Four Newtown mothers whose children were killed during the December 14th shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School have a message for the country this Mother’s Day: “We are not going away.”

In a heartbreaking essay, Jackie Barden, Nicole Hockley, Nelba Marquez-Greene and Francine Wheeler reflect upon their childrens’ lives, thank those who have stood behind them and ask others to make the Sandy Hook Promise. They write that while they’re disappointed by the Senate’s recent failure to pass additional gun regulations, they aren’t giving up on their efforts to prevent tragedies like Sandy Hook from happening in the future…

More here



Three years ago today:

President Obama points to an employee’s watch with the President’s picture during a tour of Industrial Support Inc., in Buffalo, N.Y., May 13, 2010 (Photo by Pete Souza)


Four years ago today:

First Lady Michelle Obama attends a meeting with Communities In Schools board members at the Ferebee-Hope Elementary School in Washington, D.C., May 13, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Samantha Appleton)


MoooooOOOOOooooorning! Huuuuuuuuuge thanks to UT and LP for yesterday’s posts, I wasn’t able to get back to the blog at all until this morning, so they kept the ship afloat beeeeeautifully – thank you again!

199 Responses to “Rise and Shine”

  1. May 13, 2013 at 9:49 am

    Good Monday Morning Chipsticks, TODers….Everyone!

    I hope everyone has a productive and uplifting day.

  2. 9 japa21
    May 13, 2013 at 9:51 am

  3. 10 57andfemale
    May 13, 2013 at 9:51 am

    topy 5!

  4. 11 Betsy
    May 13, 2013 at 9:51 am

    Good Morning all. Great R&S Chips. I hope you had an excellent weekend!

  5. 12 Linda
    May 13, 2013 at 9:54 am

    I have been patiently waiting to post this Look what Chris Hadfield did after his spacewalk to repair the ISS. He is coming home today…

  6. 17 desertflower
    May 13, 2013 at 9:55 am

    Morning everyone:) Happy Monday!!

  7. 19 utaustinliberal
    May 13, 2013 at 9:56 am

  8. May 13, 2013 at 9:57 am

    Heads up, Ladies! Misogyny is alive and well, and starts early. Just took my three-year-old grandson to his play group. He and a little girl, glad to see one another, ran and hugged.
    “Who is that”, I asked.
    He blushed and answered, “That’s my girl pet.”
    I balked, “girl pet?!”
    He said, “Well, Riley (his dog) is gone and Mommy said I can’t have a hamster so I got a girl pet.”

  9. 23 Debra
    May 13, 2013 at 9:58 am

    Is it just me or is CNN not making a gigantic issue about Benghazi or the IRS story lines like fox news or msnbc. Both of theses stories are trumped up to try to get at President Obama. I think CNN must know it is a load of crap.

    • May 13, 2013 at 10:18 am

      That would be a first for them.

    • 25 dotster3
      May 13, 2013 at 10:24 am

      Todd was salivating this a.m., so excited was he to be on the Benghazi/IRS “bad news for Obama” case——he was spitting in his rush to stir up (fake) outrage—–he and Joe BS Scarborough. It was beyond nauseating. I get the distinct impression that Todd hates Obama more than anyone. Sick, sick, sick.

  10. 26 utaustinliberal
    May 13, 2013 at 9:58 am

    • May 13, 2013 at 10:24 am

      Just saw this. An article from 2012:


      Political insiders and campaign-finance watchdogs have long questioned how Crossroads, the brainchild of GOP strategist Karl Rove, had characterized its intentions to the IRS.

      Now, for the first time, ProPublica has obtained the group’s application for recognition of tax-exempt status, filed in September 2010. The IRS has not yet recognized Crossroads GPS as exempt, causing some tax experts to speculate that the agency is giving the application extra scrutiny. If Crossroads GPS is ultimately not recognized, it could be forced to reveal the identities of its donors.

      The tax code allows groups like Crossroads to spend money on political campaigns u2014 and to keep their donors private u2014 as long as their primary purpose is enhancing social welfare.”

      In other words the IRS boss who is Republican and a Bush appointee thought there was something funny about these groups and decided to really take a hard look.

      Scandal? No. Game over for the media’s latest shiny object? You betcha.

    • 28 Nena20409
      May 13, 2013 at 10:41 am

      Great points that I agree with 1001%.

      I wrote this:

      Question Demagogues everywhere……when did SCOTUS OK’ed Citizen United? Yep on Jan 21, 2010.

      Question, when did tea party and all these groups in the thousands started applying rigorous for Tax Exemptions?

      How the money is funneled and redirected and misrepresented for what causes are what IRS were taxed to figure out before issuing Tax Exemptions for which they gave out many in droves.

      People, Use YOUR God Given Brains and THINK.

      When GOP and the Right machine fa-Rt-s, the National Media and the Rightwing Media machine breath in the smell and Go Bat Poop.

  11. 30 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 9:58 am

    G’morning Chips, TOD, lurkers, everyone, and congrats swbluega on #1! 🙂

  12. 33 utaustinliberal
    May 13, 2013 at 10:02 am

    Well, lookey here.

    • May 13, 2013 at 10:11 am

      The scrutiny was because of the increase in the number of applications for tax-exempt status. THAT was the red flag. It was just coincidence that these applications were for conservative organizations.

      • May 13, 2013 at 12:41 pm

        Read Nena’s comment above, swbluega. The flood of “Tea Party” and “Patriot” organizations followed the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Not too coincidental.

    • May 13, 2013 at 10:26 am

      I remember when All Saints Church in Pasadena was threatened to revoke their tax exempt status for their sermon the week before the election but not Pat Robertson and all the other RW churches that preach on rw policies of the Bush Administration.

    • May 13, 2013 at 10:27 am

      And Murray’s phrasing is flat out wrong. The IRS didn’t target these groups. It decided to scrutinize them before granting tax-exempt status. Isn’t that what they’re supposed to do instead of handing out tax-exempt status like free bubble gum?

    • May 13, 2013 at 10:30 am

      More BOTH SIDES DO IT clap-trap!

  13. May 13, 2013 at 10:03 am

    So the conservatives are screaming “abuse of power” because the IRA highly scrutinized conservative organizations that applied for a tax-exempt status. No mention that red flags were raised because of the high volume of applications that came through in a relative short time frame. No thought about the number of organizations who have a non-exempt status that are money-making operations; especially for the heads of these organizations. (Mega-churches come to mind as an example. I agree with kathryn kivett that it is past time to re-evaluate which groups should be tax exempt and triggers that would rescind this status.)

    But it’s not abuse of power when the Senate asks excessive, and typically unreasonable, questions and demanding unprecedented amounts of documents when it comes to confirming the nominees of THIS President for cabinet positions? And it’s not abuse of power to excessively use the filibuster to impede progress for the sole purpose of trying to taint President Obama’s legacy?

  14. May 13, 2013 at 10:03 am

    Regarding the IRS mess. I made a comment at the end of the last thread, but by the time I finished you guys had just left me in the dust. So I brought it over.

    This is so much phoney baloney. The IRS targets groups all the time…people who claim a high percentage of contributions, people with at-home businesses and one would wonder why they are always nabbing some Hollywood type. The question here should be did they target the group because they were Conservatives or because they requested tax exempt status and just happened to be Conservatives.

    I suppose I’m wondering how a determination of status is determined without certain input. The implications seem to suggest they were to be given the shield of tax exempt status before a determination was made.

    Bottom line…they won’t find President Obama’s prints anywhere on this crap!

  15. 42 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 10:03 am

    • 43 4morefor44
      May 13, 2013 at 10:11 am

      1. first of all, they have done that many times in recent years. david waldman of dailykos has been giving the history of that. 2. the i.r.s. should be targeting as many groups as they can. that’s the damn job of the i.r.s.!!! so another made-up story by “the news” since we know the i.r.s is supposed to police groups, especially newer ones, and they’ve been applying their investigations fairly across the political spectrum. these are facts and this is not a story.

    • 44 kathryn kivett
      May 13, 2013 at 10:11 am

      Best tweet I have read in a long time……YAAAAA for you!

    • 45 nathkatun7
      May 13, 2013 at 4:26 pm

      Great,great, tweet, Hopefruit! Thank you for continuing to expose these unethical media people.

  16. May 13, 2013 at 10:04 am

    Good Morning everyone!! What a beautiful day it is

  17. 47 Jovie
    May 13, 2013 at 10:14 am

  18. 49 Jovie
    May 13, 2013 at 10:22 am

  19. May 13, 2013 at 10:31 am

    Good morning Chips and TOD. Thanks for all the R&S news this morning, back to reading.

  20. May 13, 2013 at 10:31 am

    • 53 hopefruit2
      May 13, 2013 at 10:34 am

      And the MSM as well!

    • 55 jackiegrumbacher
      May 13, 2013 at 12:32 pm

      This is the absolute truth, meta. Everyone who voted for PBO and those too young to do so at the time are going to hold this outrageous RW and media behavior in their heart. If they think this action will suppress the Dem vote, they are epically mistaken. They are stirring up the embers of a backlash every day that this witch hunt goes on.

  21. 56 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 10:33 am

  22. 59 cookemom
    May 13, 2013 at 10:38 am

    Up and at ’em all you O’s!!!! It’s a great getting up day again around the TOD campfire!!!

    I see that old Ben Gollygee person is still in the news. I heard a newscaster ask where were the Dems on this Ben Gollygee, and the new I’s A Mess stuff. My thought was, how about inviting some on your yap, yap, yap, shows so they could speak out? Nothing like blocking them out, then pretending they’re ignoring the issues, or are running from them.

  23. 60 Nena20409
    May 13, 2013 at 10:46 am

    I love the Toon on Benghazi. That Cartoonist captured what I have thought of this whole Media and RWers obsession to find a Scandal against the Obama administration. Shame on them.

  24. 61 desertflower
    May 13, 2013 at 10:53 am

    Good for them! Maybe the rest of them will fall in line and do the right thing.


  25. 62 desertflower
    May 13, 2013 at 10:56 am

    Comment on Greg Sargent this morning:

    7:48 AM MST
    `If groups operating under section 501(c)(4) are supposed
    to be, by definition, non-political social welfare groups, then
    political activity by them is illegal. So how can conservatives complain
    that they are being targeted for political reasons? Aren’t they
    implicitly agreeing that these groups are in fact political
    organizations hiding under the rubric of social welfare organizations?.
    LikeLiked by 3 readers · Reply · Share · Flag


  26. 63 desertflower
    May 13, 2013 at 10:57 am

    Off to work….check back at lunch.

  27. May 13, 2013 at 11:02 am

    Heads up:

    11:15 AM EDT: President Obama and PM Cameron Hold a Joint Press Conference



  28. 65 JER
    May 13, 2013 at 11:02 am

    LIVE NOW: Vice President Biden University of Pennsylvania Commencement – http://www.cbsnews.com/liveFeed/widget.shtml and

  29. May 13, 2013 at 11:03 am

    Tweety go away I can’t stand you this early in the day.

    • 69 Allison
      May 13, 2013 at 11:08 am

      Why is he even on the TV now? MSNBC is really hyping this faux controversy.

    • 70 jacquelineoboomer
      May 13, 2013 at 11:09 am

      And I can’t bear to watch him, later in the day! Eek.

    • 71 Linda
      May 13, 2013 at 11:10 am

      He is there to nit pick only…..by 5 PM he will be spitting at his guest Ed Rendell.

      • May 13, 2013 at 11:35 am

        Lol Linda you are too much. I swear Tweety is one sentence short from saying President Obama is one who is responsible for Benghazi and this IRS nonsense. Who the hell do these MSM think they are, President Obama is not a liar and he certainly is NOT like that damn crook Nixon. Tweety and all these so call Journalists can go FUCK THEMSELVES.

  30. 73 yardarm756
    May 13, 2013 at 11:06 am

    Good morning everyone. Hope you Mothers had a nice day. Lets start the week with a bit o’ humor.

    Jacob, age 92, and Rebecca, age 89, living in Miami, are all excited about their decision to get married. They go for a stroll to discuss the wedding, and on the way they pass a drugstore. Jacob suggests they go in.

    Jacob addresses the man behind the counter:

    “Are you the owner?”

    The pharmacist answers, “Yes.”

    Jacob: “We’re about to get married. Do you sell heart medication?”

    Pharmacist: “Of course, we do.”

    Jacob: “How about medicine for circulation?”

    Pharmacist: “All kinds.”

    Jacob: “Medicine for rheumatism?”

    Pharmacist: “Definitely.”

    Jacob: “How about suppositories?”

    Pharmacist: “You bet!”

    Jacob: “Medicine for memory problems, arthritis and Alzheimer’s?”

    Pharmacist: “Yes, a large variety. The Works.”

    Jacob: “What about vitamins, sleeping pills, Geritol, antidotes for Parkinson’s disease?”

    Pharmacist: “Absolutely.”

    Jacob: “Everything for heartburn and indigestion?”

    Pharmacist: “We sure do.”

    Jacob: “You sell wheelchairs and walkers and canes?”

    Pharmacist: “All speeds and sizes.”

    Jacob: “Adult diapers?”

    Pharmacist: “Sure.”

    Jacob: “We’d like to use this store as our Bridal Registry.”

  31. 83 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 11:08 am

    CSPAN one TV will also carry the presser live. 🙂

  32. 86 Jovie
    May 13, 2013 at 11:11 am

    And Richard Wolfe with his British voice, saying that the IRS thingy is a scandal and its big.
    Imagine, a former British citizen alleging a Tax scandal of the American Government?
    Full circle, Much?

    • 87 debz
      May 13, 2013 at 11:29 am

      It’s only a scandal for the IRS. PBO is not Nixon and does not give orders to some low level employee in one city to attack groups. This is the type of issue that Congressional oversight committees are supposed to investigate. It should have nothing to do with any President.

      • 88 jacquelineoboomer
        May 13, 2013 at 11:36 am

        I’m sure that rule, “should have nothing to do with any President,” isn’t meant for THIS President. Think they changed THOSE rules on Jan. 20, 2009.

  33. 89 LunarSea
    May 13, 2013 at 11:12 am

    wiating for O’Biden. to speak. crowd is pumped for the grads & to hear VPOTUS speak

  34. May 13, 2013 at 11:14 am

    Press conference moved indoors because of bad weather

  35. 94 debz
    May 13, 2013 at 11:15 am

    I know our President would never do this, but, when the inevitable BENGHAZI! question comes up he could shut it down by asking why the GOP is using the deaths of 4 Americans to fund-raise.

  36. 97 Jovie
    May 13, 2013 at 11:26 am

    Max Baucus sounds like he has a score to settle while on his way out!

    • 98 jacquelineoboomer
      May 13, 2013 at 11:29 am

      Dana Bash is positively salivating right now … they’re all like the vultures who hover above the roadkill on the highway. The only problem is that President Obama will do the right thing about this questionable episode and every other matter that comes before him. Begone, vultures!

    • 99 Lovepolitics2008
      May 13, 2013 at 11:53 am

      Max Baucus is mad at the President for something. ANd when Max Baucus is mad at you, watch out. Ask Tom Dashle…

      When Baucus said publicly that the implementation of Obamacare “was a train-wreck”, he got my attention… But now with this new statement about the IRS, there is NO DOUBT in my mind that his agenda is to hurt the president. Is it related to the emotional statement the President made after the defeat of the gun safety rules in the Senate, when he expresses his disgust over all the people who voted NO ? Or is is something that happened prior to that ?

      Whatever it is, I doubt it’s very big. NOTHING that can justify the meanness of Max Baucus.

      I’m happy he’s retiring. Good riddance.

  37. 100 Jewelz
    May 13, 2013 at 11:26 am

    I am looking forward to the joint press conference between president Obama and prime minister Cameron. I think it will be epic to watch the president school these idiots without mercy. What time is the presser?

    I’ve read on this site and some other democratic sites where people questioned why we don’t often see democrats on TV defending this president or his policies. Well, based on my observations, there are a lot of people in the democratic party that are extremely jealous of PBO and his accomplishments. When then Senator Obama decided to run for president, some democrats were okay with him running but they never thought he had much of a chance against Hillary Clinton to win the nomination. Only a handful of democrats in congress believed that he could do it, and they mostly consisted of Dick Durbin, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Bob Casey, Claire McCaskill, Jack Reed, Ken Salazer, Sherrod Brown, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jesse Jackson Jr., Jan Schakowsky, Neil Abercrombie, and a few more whose names skip my mind at the moment,

    Some democrats in congress were okay with then Senator Obama as long as they could use his popularity to bring out voters in congressional election in 2006. Barack Obama was so useful to democrats running for elections and re-elections in 2006 that he was constantly asked to travel from places to places to campaign for them. They were okay with him being the face of the democratic party as long as he knew his place and understood that he had to wait his turn. Senator Dick Durbin was one of the first to encourage him to run for president. Durbin believed then that it was his time to do it and not to wait for another election cycle. Only a handful actually believed he had a shot. The rest probably thought he was in over his head. They knew Barack Obama was popular amongst the youth, and they thought they could use his popularity to help turn out votes for the democratic party as a whole. They thought all he needed was to stay competitive with Hillary but they never wanted or expected him to beat Hillary. They were as shocked as Hillary was when he not only won Iowa, but ended up winning all the Caucus states with Nevada being the exception. There was a lot to be gained by these people if Hillary had won the nomination and the presidency. Go back and research the attitudes of some members of the democratic congressional caucus during the 2007-2008 campaign even when it was evident that Hillary could never overcome the number of delegates that Barack Obama had accumulated. The only thing she had going for her were the number of supergelegates she had in her corner at the time. Instead of putting their foot down by being frank with Hillary, they didn’t and allowed the contest to continued knowing full well that Hillary had no chance of ever overtaking Obama. If the situation had been reversed, there was no way they would have allowed Barack Obama to continued to stay on in the campaign like that. I remembered what some of those idiots said at the time. And these are your democrats.

    There is no doubt in my mind that there is deep jealousy and maybe even some hatred towards PBO among some members of his own party. The jealousy stemmed from the fact that they never felt that he paid his dues. Some could never fathom how a relatively unknown just a few years ago could rise to the top of the political enchelon so fast without money, power, or political dynasty behind him. The fact that he owed them nothing to get to the top irks a lot of them. He not only did it his way, he did it the right way. He did it in a way that will forever be remembered in the history book. The Obama Campaign model will be studied and implemented by political operatives to help their clients in future political campaigns. Don’t be fooled by the smiling faces during SOTU. There are people jealous of him from the progressive caucus, the congressional black caucus, the fictional blue dog caucus, the Hillary should’ve been president caucus, and just about every democratic caucus out there. I don’t blame President Obama for not trusting many of these people. They are vultures that would like nothing more than to see his downfall. The thing is PBO doesn’t need them in his corner, he already has us. We the People will always have his back.

    Sorry for the long post.

    • May 13, 2013 at 11:36 am

      TELL THE TRUTH, why don’t you?

    • 102 debz
      May 13, 2013 at 11:38 am

      How true, just like 2010 when PBO was out campaigning for them while they ran away from him. This time for 2014, they have POTUS & FLOTUS fundraising for their election while they are out there campaigning for Hillary 2016.

    • 103 kathryn kivett
      May 13, 2013 at 11:40 am

      Thank you for being so honest and bringing this to the forefront….you explained to me what I have been wondering and fretting about….I believe I agree with you b/c it makes so much sense….it is so much deeper than race and it reinforces my decision to leave the Dem party when PBO is no longer President, unless of course he could persuade me to stay …..a wink and a smile in the rain might do it ; ^ )…

    • 104 EDP4BHO
      May 13, 2013 at 9:05 pm

      Bravo and amen !! Hi TOD, long time no write. Busy but I lurk.

  38. 105 kathryn kivett
    May 13, 2013 at 11:26 am

    David Coryn is so loyal

    • 106 Roberta in MN
      May 13, 2013 at 1:58 pm

      Sorry,, I don’t believe that for a minute. If it gets readers he will give his lunch up. The article on the hearings wasn’t quite true. I must have watched something else.

  39. 107 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 11:27 am

    As Allison posted earlier, MSNBC is at the forefront of these IRS/Benghazi nontroversies. Glad I ditched this faux “Liberal” network a while back.

  40. 110 dotster3
    May 13, 2013 at 11:28 am

    Was the tweet I saw correct?—only 1 question for each, Obama and Cameron?

  41. 113 cookemom
    May 13, 2013 at 11:29 am

    So I was just notified that my community qualifies for FEMA disaster aid after the April 18th floods. It’s a good thing for folks who lost so much. I got the flooded basement and had to throw out quite a bit of stuff. I’m not gonna claim anything though, unless they’re willing to put in a new permanent solution for me, and I know that’s not about to happen. A good thing to know; it’s worth it to pay the little extra for flood coverage on your home owner’s insurance, whether you live on a flood plane or not. There’s also info on the FEMA site that will tell you if you’re on a flood plane or not. If you’re not, then the extra on your insurance won’t be that much. With climate changing as it is, you never know when you may suddenly be faced with it. We never had this issue until within the last 5 or 6 years in my area of the community.

  42. May 13, 2013 at 11:31 am

  43. 118 Jovie
    May 13, 2013 at 11:35 am

    And we go to Peter Alexander for comments. Umm, isn’t he one of Romney’s Sons?

  44. 121 utaustinliberal
    May 13, 2013 at 11:35 am

  45. 122 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 11:35 am

    • 123 debz
      May 13, 2013 at 11:44 am

      It should be THE scandal along with all of the judges who have been filibustered, but when “journalists” like those in the WHPC are probably getting paid by the gop, they will never bring it up. Someone should look into the bank account of that J. Karl guy from ABC.

  46. May 13, 2013 at 11:36 am

  47. 126 utaustinliberal
    May 13, 2013 at 11:42 am

  48. 127 japa21
    May 13, 2013 at 11:43 am

  49. 128 utaustinliberal
    May 13, 2013 at 11:44 am

    The GOP is just that stupid.

  50. 129 japa21
    May 13, 2013 at 11:47 am

  51. 130 Jovie
    May 13, 2013 at 11:49 am

  52. 131 yardarm756
    May 13, 2013 at 11:53 am

  53. 132 jacquelineoboomer
    May 13, 2013 at 11:53 am

    Bet ya any amount of money – even $10K – that none of the reporters listened to ANYTHING President Obama or PM Cameron said. First question(s): IRS, Benghazi. As expected. President Obama answers the IRS question like the master communicator he is.

  54. May 13, 2013 at 11:54 am

  55. 134 cookemom
    May 13, 2013 at 11:57 am

    PBO asks of the MSM, “Isn’t 4 months enough time for you jerks to cover this fairly, now that investigations and recommendations have been done? This is a circus and you folks are letting the clowns dictate the coverage”

  56. 135 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 12:00 pm

  57. 136 jacquelineoboomer
    May 13, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    He went there. Slap that podium, Mr. President! Then slap the bitches in the audience. I’ll hold ’em for ya.

  58. 141 cookemom
    May 13, 2013 at 12:01 pm

    PBO got that look, and he ain’t playing. Of course, that won’t stop them, they’re a dog with a bone.

    • 142 jacquelineoboomer
      May 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm

      I hope to find just the President’s response to that question on BenSideshow on YouTube or here (from our dear Chips), and tweet it to each and every reporter who brings up anything on the topic from this point on.

  59. May 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm

  60. 144 debz
    May 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    Yes!! He brought up the fund-raising. Loved that he called it out as a circus.

    • May 13, 2013 at 12:11 pm

      Because it is Debz is like these MSM and Repubs are throwing everything hoping it will stick and what is so disappointing is that the credible journalists out there will not call out this for what it is “political theatre”. It just makes me mad man, enough already

  61. May 13, 2013 at 12:04 pm

    You see the difference between that BBC reporter and the assholes of the WHPC.

  62. 154 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 12:04 pm

  63. 155 yardarm756
    May 13, 2013 at 12:06 pm

    A**hole Issa.

  64. 161 jacquelineoboomer
    May 13, 2013 at 12:06 pm

  65. 162 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 12:07 pm

    • May 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm

      The U.S media can’t help themselves they were born that way. I am certain many of them hit their heads when they were babies because I just cannot fathom how a group of suppose intelligent people act so damn stupid 100% of the time

    • 164 nathkatun7
      May 13, 2013 at 5:03 pm

      I think we should stop calling them U.S. media. Rather they should be considered as a GOP propaganda machine.

  66. 165 jacquelineoboomer
    May 13, 2013 at 12:13 pm

  67. May 13, 2013 at 12:14 pm

  68. May 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm

    YAY, POTUS swats more flies. Calls them out for the carnival barkers they’ve become. RIGHT ON.

    Chips, can I have my birthday cake now?

  69. 177 yardarm756
    May 13, 2013 at 12:17 pm

    And Chuckie and Tweetie are talking ‘style points’ about the Presidents speech. He was outraged enough it seems!

  70. 183 hopefruit2
    May 13, 2013 at 12:17 pm

  71. 184 amk for obama
    May 13, 2013 at 12:17 pm

    Excellent r&s, bt.

    International news media doesn’t give a jacksquat about bengazhi.

  72. 188 japa21
    May 13, 2013 at 12:18 pm

  73. May 13, 2013 at 12:18 pm

    GAH, how they love to pat each other on the back.

    • 190 Jewelz
      May 13, 2013 at 12:32 pm

      Meta, it’s because they are miserable in their lives. They have nothing going for them except for their collective hatred for PBO and his administration.

  74. 191 Nena20409
    May 13, 2013 at 12:20 pm

    Today is 5-13-13……Stevie Wonder’s Birthday 🙂

    So Here’s to Stevie Wonder………

  75. 192 cookemom
    May 13, 2013 at 12:21 pm

    PBO was dismissive of Ben Golly, by golly. Now the bad eggs have to move to the “I’s A Mess” issue for poutrage.

    Side show is apt description.

    • 193 Nena20409
      May 13, 2013 at 12:29 pm

      These things gain legs for Dems are Never out there defending this POTUS. The media get fed these things and they run with it for folks like Ed Randell, Dems in congress and former Obama operatives are Never out there strongly defending this president.

      Pres Obama answering Benghazi and IRS questions once, Never resolves the narrative.

  76. 194 cookemom
    May 13, 2013 at 12:28 pm

    Found this on a FB page. Just something else to blame PBO for.

    The U.S. government reported a rare surplus of $113 billion for April — the largest in five years and a sign of the nation’s improving finances…….
    Through the first seven months of the budget year, the deficit was $488 billion, according to the Treasury. That’s lower than last year’s deficit of $720 billion over the same period. http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2013-05-10/us-treasury-reports-113b-surplus-in-april

    • 195 Nena20409
      May 13, 2013 at 12:31 pm

      It was posted here either on R&S on Friday or it was on a Thread on Thursday.

      It is worth repeating. Bobfr and many other TOD Tweet brigades did great spreading the news.

  77. 197 amk for obama
    May 13, 2013 at 12:29 pm

  78. 199 kathryn kivett
    May 13, 2013 at 1:22 pm

    I really, really like Sen. Angus King from Maine…

Comments are currently closed.







Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.



RSS Obama White House.gov

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS WH Tumblr

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Steve Benen

  • GOP closer to ousting Rep. Cheney from Conference chair; Cheney says GOP is at 'turning point'
  • Education Secretary expects schools to be open for in-person learning in September
  • 'You wanted to be just like him': MLB's oldest living Hall of Famer turns 90
  • Liz Cheney is playing a 'very smart long game,' says GOP strategist
  • Facebook was complicit in what happened, says writer after oversight ruling



Blog Stats

  • 42,993,049 hits

%d bloggers like this: